← Back to blog
Two Wallets, Two Jobs: Where Arca Fits Alongside Stargazer
Jun 03, 2026・5 min read

Two Wallets, Two Jobs: Where Arca Fits Alongside Stargazer

Arca and Stargazer are two Constellation Network wallets with different jobs. Stargazer is for DAG and metagraphs. Arca is the dollar wallet for everyday use.

If you have been around Constellation Network for any length of time, you know Stargazer. It is the wallet that gets you into the Hypergraph. It holds your DAG, signs your metagraph transactions, plugs into hardware wallets, and gives node operators and metagraph builders the tools they need to actually run on the network.

So when people in the community see Arca for the first time, the question we get is fair: "Why a second wallet?"

The short answer is that Arca and Stargazer are not competing for the same job. They serve different audiences with different needs, and the products are built around that gap all the way down. One is a power tool. The other is a checking account. You can, and probably should, use both.

Here is how to think about it.

Stargazer is the network wallet

Stargazer is what you reach for when your goal is to interact with Constellation itself.

That means holding DAG, sending DAG, delegating to a node, moving L0 and L1 tokens issued by metagraphs, signing transactions for projects building on the Hypergraph, and pairing a hardware wallet when you want hardware-grade key storage. The Chrome extension is the dApp surface that metagraphs and integrations depend on, and it gives you the full reach of the network from the browser.

Stargazer also supports testnet and integrationnet, which is what turns it into a real builder tool. Metagraph teams can develop, test, and integrate against the network using the same wallet their users already have installed. That kind of environment parity is rare, and it is one of the reasons Stargazer remains the default for anyone building on Constellation.

Stargazer is also open source. The community can read the code, audit it, fork it, and contribute. For a wallet that sits at the center of network participation, that kind of transparency matters, and it is part of what makes Stargazer the right tool for the people who care most about how the network works.

It is multichain too, but multichain in a very specific sense. Stargazer supports other networks because the Constellation ecosystem extends beyond Hypergraph itself. Some ecosystem tokens live on other chains. Bridged versions of DAG and DOR exist on Base and Ink. Stargazer covers that surface so users can move with their assets, not because chasing every network is the goal, but because following the ecosystem is.

If you are a DAG holder, an early supporter, a builder, a node operator, or someone running multi-chain bridges into Constellation, Stargazer is your home base. Nothing about Arca changes that.

Arca is the consumer dollar wallet

Arca is built for a completely different user. It is built for the person who has never set up a seed phrase, never paid a gas fee, never thought about the difference between L1 and L2, and never wanted to. It is built for someone who needs digital dollars to send to family, save for the future, or pay for things, and who would rather not learn an industry to do it.

That is why Arca looks and feels like a neobank. Balances are in dollars. The home tab is called Wallet. Saving lives in a tab called SimpleFi. There is no jargon to translate. You hold your own keys, but you never see them. Network fees are sponsored, so users do not need to keep a balance of native tokens just to move money. Login is a social account or a passkey. The closest analogy is a fintech app, not a crypto wallet.

Arca abstracts away the networks and the token tickers. The user sees a dollar balance and moves dollars. Smart account abstraction does the routing, fee sponsorship, and settlement underneath so that the experience can stay simple even when the underlying mechanics are not. That is a deliberate choice. The whole product is about hiding the parts of crypto that have always kept regular people out.

Where the two overlap (and where they do not)

The honest version of this comparison is that there is very little overlap, and the overlap that exists is intentional.

Both products are wallets in the strict sense. You control your own funds. You sign your own transactions. Your keys never leave your control. Both are part of the same Constellation Network ecosystem and reflect the same long-term vision: that on-chain infrastructure should serve real people, not just power users.

The differences are where it gets interesting.

Stargazer assumes you understand what a network is. Arca assumes you do not care.

Stargazer gives you full custody of a recovery phrase and expects you to keep it safe. Arca gives you key recovery through passkeys and social login, so a lost phone is not a lost wallet.

Stargazer holds DAG, metagraph tokens, and the ecosystem assets that reach into other chains, because those are the assets its users want to interact with. Arca focuses on dollars, with savings and apps layered on top, because those are the assets its users want to use.

Stargazer is designed for depth. Arca is designed for adoption.

When to use which

If you are reading this, you are likely a Stargazer user already. So the more useful question is: when does it make sense to add Arca?

Use Arca when you want a dollar balance that behaves like a checking account. Sending money to someone who is not in crypto, paying through Arca Apps, parking a portion of your dollars in savings through SimpleFi, or just having a clean, low-friction surface for day-to-day spending. Arca is the wallet you can hand to a family member or a friend who has never used crypto, and they will be able to use it within a few minutes.

Keep Stargazer for the things you already use it for. Holding DAG, participating in the network, signing into metagraph projects, running validator workflows, and any time you need the depth of a power-user wallet.

The two work in parallel. There is no migration. There is no "switching." Stargazer does not lose anything because Arca exists. Arca is not a watered-down Stargazer. They are two different products with two different jobs, and the Constellation ecosystem is stronger for having both.

The bigger picture

A lot of crypto teams try to build one wallet that serves everyone. The result is usually a product that is too technical for normal users and too simplified for power users. We did not want to make that trade.

Stargazer keeps doing what it has always done well: giving the Constellation community the tools to participate fully in the network. Arca extends the reach of the ecosystem to people who would never set up a seed phrase but absolutely will use a wallet that looks and feels like the banking app on their phone.

Both wallets come from the same team and reflect the same values, just behind two different front doors. Pick the one that fits the job in front of you, and use the other when the job changes.

If you have not tried Arca yet, the alpha is live today. Stargazer is where it has always been. And the road ahead, for both of them, runs through the same place.

Get started